Target better. Measure everything. Prove ROI.
Build precision audiences, measure real-world attribution, and optimize campaigns with the industry's most reliable location data.

Trusted by Leaders in Adtech,
Enterprise, GIS, and Research
Purpose-Built for Modern Advertising
From programmatic to OOH, Veraset powers smarter campaigns across every channel.
Create custom audiences based on real-world behavior. Stadium visitors, QSR loyalists, luxury shoppers—if they visit, we can target them. 300M+ devices, refreshed daily.
Measure actual foot traffic lift, not modeled estimates. Track store visits, dwell time, and cross-visitation patterns to prove campaign ROI with confidence.
CCPA and GDPR compliant from day one. Pseudonymized IDs, first-party data, and industry-leading consent frameworks keep you safe while you scale.

We protect consumer privacy while delivering the insights you need
Every device ID is pseudonymized. Every data point is consent-based. Every delivery is encrypted. We handle privacy so you can focus on performance. Our compliance team stays ahead of regulations globally, ensuring your campaigns remain effective and ethical.

Learn. Explore. Innovate.
Get the latest insights, product updates, and technical documentation.
New platform enables teams to turn large-scale mobility datasets into insights, audiences and action.
Veraset Launches Orchestrator, a Self-Serve Platform for Scalable Mobility Intelligence
ALEXANDRIA, VA — March 24, 2026 — Veraset, a global provider of privacy-safe mobility data, today announced the launch of Orchestrator, a self-serve platform that enables organizations to transform mobility data into repeatable workflows, insights, and audiences without complex engineering or manual data pulls.
As demand for real-world behavioral insights grows across industries — from advertising and retail to real estate and urban planning — organizations increasingly rely on mobility data to understand how people move, visit locations, and interact with physical environments. Yet working with mobility data often requires engineering resources, manual scripts, and custom data extracts that limit accessibility for many organizations.
Orchestrator simplifies that process by giving analysts, marketing and data teams direct, self-serve access to mobility intelligence.
“With Orchestrator, we’re putting the power of mobility data directly in the hands of the people who need it,” said Geoffrey Prince, CEO of Veraset. “Teams can explore location intelligence, analyze behavior, and move from insight to activation far faster than traditional data workflows allow.”
Using Orchestrator, organizations can define locations and points of interest, extract mobility data across flexible geographies and timeframes, analyze visitation and movement patterns, and transform those insights into datasets or audience cohorts for research, measurement, or activation.
The platform enables teams to build automated workflows that replace one-off data pulls with repeatable processes. Users can schedule recurring queries and reports, analyze results through maps and dashboards, and export compliant datasets or audiences for downstream analytics and advertising platforms.
Orchestrator is designed to support a wide range of use cases, including foot traffic analysis, market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
The launch of Orchestrator expands how organizations can access Veraset’s mobility data. In addition to the self-serve platform, Veraset continues to provide mobility datasets via flat file delivery for large-scale data processing and API access for automated querying and integration into existing products or workflows.
Veraset’s mobility intelligence is built on more than 10 billion daily location observations across over 200 countries, providing global coverage and device-level precision. The company’s datasets, including movement, visits, home and work insights, and trips, are trusted by organizations across advertising, technology, consulting, real estate, retail, education, and municipalities to understand real-world behavior at scale.
Orchestrator is available today to Veraset customers. Click here to learn more.
About Veraset
Veraset transforms real-world movement into trusted mobility intelligence. Its privacy-first, responsibly sourced data spans 200+ countries and powers critical use cases including market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience and visitation insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
From raw location signals to structured journey insights, delivered via direct data access, API, or self-serve tools, Veraset provides the reliable foundation teams need to move faster, go deeper, and build smarter solutions. Learn more at www.veraset.com

The FTC is intensifying its oversight of sensitive location data, enforcing stricter transparency, consent, and privacy standards across the data ecosystem.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently intensified its focus on the protection of sensitive location data, marking a significant shift in its regulatory approach. This heightened scrutiny is evident through a series of enforcement actions against data brokers and companies involved in the collection, processing, and sale of location data. These actions underscore the FTC's commitment to safeguarding consumer privacy and ensuring that companies adhere to transparent and ethical data practices.
X-Mode Social and Outlogic
On January 9, 2024, the FTC issued its first-ever prohibition on the use, sale, and disclosure of sensitive location data against X-Mode Social and Outlogic (collectively referred to as "X-Mode"). This landmark action was driven by allegations that X-Mode engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by misrepresenting the use of location data and failing to obtain proper consumer consent. The FTC's complaint highlighted several critical issues:
- Inadequate Disclosure of Use and Purpose: X-Mode's privacy disclosures were found to be insufficient, failing to inform consumers about the full extent of data usage, including the sale of location data to government entities. This lack of transparency prevented consumers from making informed decisions about their data.
- Inadequate Protections for Sensitive Data: Until May 2023, X-Mode did not restrict the collection of location data from sensitive locations such as healthcare facilities, churches, and schools. The company lacked policies to remove sensitive locations from raw data before selling it, raising significant privacy concerns.
- Failure to Honor Consumer Privacy Choices: X-Mode was criticized for not respecting consumer privacy preferences, particularly in cases where users had opted out of data collection.
The FTC's order against X-Mode mandated the implementation of an SDK Supplier Assessment Program to ensure that third-party apps using X-Mode's software development kits (SDKs) obtained proper consumer consent and adhered to privacy standards.
InMarket Media
Shortly after the action against X-Mode, the FTC announced a similar enforcement action against InMarket Media on January 18, 2024. The case against InMarket emphasized the need for transparency, proper notice, and consumer consent regarding the processing of sensitive location data. Key issues identified in the complaint included:
- Lack of Consumer Notification: InMarket failed to notify consumers that their location data was being used for targeted advertising. The consent screens within apps only mentioned that location data would be used for app functionality, omitting details about precise location tracking and its commercial use.
- Excessive Data Retention: InMarket's five-year retention period for location data was deemed excessively long, increasing the risk of data misuse or re-identification.
The FTC's order against InMarket prohibited the company from sharing, selling, or transferring sensitive location data without explicit consumer consent.
Broader Implications and Industry Impact
The FTC's recent actions against X-Mode and InMarket are part of a broader effort to address the growing concerns over the use of personal data in advertising and other commercial activities. These cases highlight several critical themes that are likely to shape future regulatory actions:
- Transparency and Consumer Consent. One of the central issues in both the X-Mode and InMarket cases was the lack of transparency and inadequate consumer consent. The FTC has made it clear that companies must provide clear and conspicuous privacy disclosures that accurately describe how consumer data will be used. Vaguely worded consent forms or disclosures that omit critical information are insufficient and can lead to enforcement actions.
- Protection of Sensitive Data. The FTC has emphasized that certain types of data, such as location data, are inherently sensitive and require robust protections. This sensitivity is due to the potential for such data to reveal intimate details about a person's life, such as visits to medical facilities, places of worship, or other sensitive locations. The FTC's actions signal that the sale or misuse of such data without proper safeguards is unacceptable.
- Data Minimization and Retention Policies. The FTC has also focused on the principles of data minimization and appropriate data retention periods. Companies are encouraged to collect only the data necessary for their operations and to retain it for the shortest time possible. Long retention periods increase the risk of data breaches and misuse, and the FTC is likely to scrutinize such practices closely.
- Future Directions and Regulatory Trends. The FTC's recent enforcement actions are indicative of a broader regulatory trend towards stricter oversight of data practices. Several key themes and potential future directions can be identified:
- Increased Enforcement and Penalties. The FTC has signaled its intention to continue aggressive enforcement actions against companies that violate consumer privacy. This includes not only fines and penalties but also more stringent measures such as outright bans on certain data practices, as seen in the cases against X-Mode and InMarket.
- Focus on Upstream Liability. FTC Chair Lina Khan has emphasized the importance of addressing upstream liability, targeting not just the consumer-facing applications but also the backend infrastructure that facilitates data collection and processing. This approach aims to hold all actors in the data ecosystem accountable for their roles in enabling unlawful conduct.
- Algorithmic Disgorgement. The FTC has increasingly used the tool of algorithmic disgorgement, requiring companies to delete not only unlawfully obtained data but also the data products created from such data. This measure aims to address the incentives that drive harmful data practices and ensure that companies do not benefit from their unlawful actions.
- Comprehensive Privacy Legislation. There is growing support within the FTC for comprehensive privacy legislation that would provide baseline protections for all consumers. Such legislation could help address the challenges posed by new technologies and business models that rely on extensive data collection.
Summing up
The FTC's recent enforcement actions against X-Mode Social, Outlogic, and InMarket Media represent a significant step towards stronger protection of sensitive location data. These actions highlight the importance of transparency, consumer consent, and robust data protection measures.
As the data economy continues to evolve, the FTC's regulatory approach is likely to become increasingly critical in ensuring that consumer privacy is respected and protected. Companies operating in this space must heed the lessons from these enforcement actions and adopt best practices to avoid similar scrutiny in the future.
.jpg)
Learn how mobile location data is collected, how GPS signals work, the difference between foreground and background collection, and how mobility insights are created.
Mobile location data powers many of the digital experiences people use every day, like navigation apps, weather forecasts and online food ordering.
But despite how common location-enabled applications have become, there’s still significant misunderstanding around how mobile location data is actually collected and used. One of the biggest misconceptions is that mobile devices are continuously tracking and transmitting a perfectly complete “breadcrumb trail” of a person’s movement every second of the day.
In reality, modern mobility data works very differently.
In this article, we’ll explain:
- What is mobile location data
- How mobile location data is collected
- What GPS signals actually represent
- The difference between foreground and background collection
- Why location data is not “always on”
- How raw signals become mobility insights
What Is Mobile Location Data?
Mobile location data refers to geographic signals generated by mobile devices, typically smartphones, when apps or operating systems access location services.
These signals may include:
- GPS coordinates
- Wi-Fi positioning
- Bluetooth proximity
- Cell tower triangulation
- Timestamp data
- Device movement signals
When combined and processed at scale, these signals help organizations understand broader movement patterns, visitation trends, audience behavior, transportation flows, and geographic activity.
Mobility data is used across industries including:
- Advertising and media
- Retail and QSR
- Urban planning
- Transportation
- Research and academia
- Real estate
- Tourism and economic development
How Mobile Devices Generate Location Signals
Location signals are typically generated when a mobile application accesses a device’s location services. Additionally the user has to provide permissions for the application to use their location.
This can happen during activities such as:
- Opening a weather app
- Requesting directions
- Searching nearby businesses
- Using rideshare or delivery apps
- Checking in at locations
- Interacting with map-enabled applications
Importantly, location data collection is generally event-driven and not constant. Mobile devices do not continuously transmit a perfect second-by-second record of movement.
Instead, signals are generated intermittently based on:
- App usage
- Device settings
- Permission settings
- Operating system behavior
- Battery optimization
- Signal availability
This means mobility datasets represent samples of movement activity, not uninterrupted tracking streams.
Foreground vs Background Location Collection
A key concept in understanding mobile location data is the difference between foreground and background collection.
Foreground Collection
Foreground collection occurs when a user is actively interacting with an application.
For example:
- Using a navigation app for directions
- Looking up current temperatures in a weather app
- Searching within a retail app for stores nearby
These interactions often produce higher-frequency and more precise location signals because the app is actively requesting location updates.
Background Collection
Background collection occurs when an app receives permission to access location data while running in the background, beyond the times when an app is opened.
However, even background collection is not continuous or unlimited.
Modern mobile operating systems increasingly restrict:
- Frequency of updates
- Background refresh behavior
- Battery usage
- Permission access
As a result, location data availability varies significantly across devices, apps, and operating environments. This is one reason mobility data should not be interpreted as a complete “always-on” movement record.
Why Mobile Location Data Is Not “Always On”
One of the most common misconceptions about mobility data is the idea that smartphones are constantly transmitting exact user locations every moment of the day.
In reality, location signal generation is highly dependent on:
- User behavior
- App engagement
- Permission settings
- Device operating systems
- Signal availability
- Battery optimization controls
This creates natural gaps between observed signals.
For example:
- A device may generate multiple signals during active navigation
- Then generate very few signals while idle
- Or temporarily stop transmitting location updates altogether
As a result, mobility data is best understood as a series of observed location events — not a perfectly continuous tracking feed. Understanding this distinction is important when analyzing movement behavior, visitation patterns, and geographic trends at scale.
From Raw Signals to Mobility Insights
Raw GPS points alone are not inherently useful. To transform raw signals into actionable mobility intelligence, data providers apply additional processing and analysis.
This may include:
- Filtering noisy or inaccurate signals
- Removing duplicate observations
- Mapping coordinates to points of interest (POIs)
- Identifying visits and dwell behavior
- Aggregating movement patterns
- Applying spatial indexing frameworks
- Validating signal quality
This processing helps convert billions of fragmented location observations into structured datasets that can support analysis and decision-making.
For example, processed mobility data can help organizations understand:
- Store visitation trends
- Trade areas
- Tourism flows
- Audience movement patterns
- Transportation behavior
- Event impact
- Regional activity changes
Why Data Quality Matters
Not all mobility datasets are created equal.
The usefulness of mobility intelligence depends heavily on:
- Signal quality
- Coverage consistency
- Data processing methodologies
- POI accuracy
- Timestamp precision
- Spatial resolution
- Privacy and consent frameworks
High-quality mobility datasets require sophisticated processing pipelines to improve accuracy and reduce noise before analysis occurs.
This is especially important for organizations using mobility data for:
- Research
- Measurement
- Planning
- Audience development
- Modeling
- Operational decision-making
Final Thoughts
Mobile location data has become foundational to modern geospatial analysis and mobility intelligence. Understanding how location data actually works is critical for interpreting it correctly.
Mobile devices do not continuously broadcast perfect movement trails. Instead, mobility datasets are built from intermittent location observations generated through app activity, device behavior, and operating system permissions. Transforming those raw signals into useful mobility intelligence requires significant processing, validation, and geospatial analysis.
As organizations increasingly rely on location intelligence to understand real-world behavior, having a strong understanding of how mobility data is collected, processed, and interpreted becomes increasingly important.
At Veraset, mobility intelligence is built on transforming large-scale location signals into structured, actionable geospatial insights that help organizations better understand movement, visitation, and real-world behavior at scale.

What Our Partners Say
Hear from organizations building with Veraset data.
“Partnering with Veraset has elevated our ability to deliver highly effective, data-driven campaigns. They’re not just a data provider, they’re a strategic partner that has helped us deliver better outcomes for our clients.”
Put Our Data to the Test
Request a demo or start an evaluation today.




