Build Smarter Cities with Real-World Movement Data
Transform mobility patterns into actionable insights for infrastructure planning, transit optimization, and community development.

Trusted by Leaders in Adtech,
Enterprise, GIS, and Research
Data-Driven Planning for Modern Cities
Make informed decisions about infrastructure, transit, and development with comprehensive mobility intelligence.
Understand real movement patterns across all modes—pedestrian, vehicle, and transit. Identify bottlenecks, optimize signal timing, and validate transportation models with ground truth data from 300M+ devices.
Measure how infrastructure changes affect different neighborhoods. Track accessibility to essential services, monitor gentrification patterns, and ensure equitable development with demographic-enriched movement data.
upport planning decisions with objective mobility metrics. From zoning changes to transit expansions, use historical patterns and real-time data to model impacts and build community consensus.

We protect consumer privacy while delivering the insights you need
Every device ID is pseudonymized. Every data point is consent-based. Every delivery is encrypted. We handle privacy so you can focus on performance. Our compliance team stays ahead of regulations globally, ensuring your campaigns remain effective and ethical.

Learn. Explore. Innovate.
Get the latest insights, product updates, and technical documentation.
New platform enables teams to turn large-scale mobility datasets into insights, audiences and action.
Veraset Launches Orchestrator, a Self-Serve Platform for Scalable Mobility Intelligence
ALEXANDRIA, VA — March 24, 2026 — Veraset, a global provider of privacy-safe mobility data, today announced the launch of Orchestrator, a self-serve platform that enables organizations to transform mobility data into repeatable workflows, insights, and audiences without complex engineering or manual data pulls.
As demand for real-world behavioral insights grows across industries — from advertising and retail to real estate and urban planning — organizations increasingly rely on mobility data to understand how people move, visit locations, and interact with physical environments. Yet working with mobility data often requires engineering resources, manual scripts, and custom data extracts that limit accessibility for many organizations.
Orchestrator simplifies that process by giving analysts, marketing and data teams direct, self-serve access to mobility intelligence.
“With Orchestrator, we’re putting the power of mobility data directly in the hands of the people who need it,” said Geoffrey Prince, CEO of Veraset. “Teams can explore location intelligence, analyze behavior, and move from insight to activation far faster than traditional data workflows allow.”
Using Orchestrator, organizations can define locations and points of interest, extract mobility data across flexible geographies and timeframes, analyze visitation and movement patterns, and transform those insights into datasets or audience cohorts for research, measurement, or activation.
The platform enables teams to build automated workflows that replace one-off data pulls with repeatable processes. Users can schedule recurring queries and reports, analyze results through maps and dashboards, and export compliant datasets or audiences for downstream analytics and advertising platforms.
Orchestrator is designed to support a wide range of use cases, including foot traffic analysis, market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
The launch of Orchestrator expands how organizations can access Veraset’s mobility data. In addition to the self-serve platform, Veraset continues to provide mobility datasets via flat file delivery for large-scale data processing and API access for automated querying and integration into existing products or workflows.
Veraset’s mobility intelligence is built on more than 10 billion daily location observations across over 200 countries, providing global coverage and device-level precision. The company’s datasets, including movement, visits, home and work insights, and trips, are trusted by organizations across advertising, technology, consulting, real estate, retail, education, and municipalities to understand real-world behavior at scale.
Orchestrator is available today to Veraset customers. Click here to learn more.
About Veraset
Veraset transforms real-world movement into trusted mobility intelligence. Its privacy-first, responsibly sourced data spans 200+ countries and powers critical use cases including market planning, measurement and performance analysis, audience and visitation insights, site selection, advanced research, platform enrichment, and more.
From raw location signals to structured journey insights, delivered via direct data access, API, or self-serve tools, Veraset provides the reliable foundation teams need to move faster, go deeper, and build smarter solutions. Learn more at www.veraset.com

The surprising foot-traffic champion of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
What movement data revealed about visitor behavior during the 2026 FIFA World Cup
The 2026 FIFA World Cup spent its opening weeks on US soil: eleven host cities; billions of eyes; sold-out stadiums from Seattle to Miami.
And by the numbers, the world really did show up: more than a million international visitors from 194 countries were in the US in the first three weeks alone, led by Mexico, Canada, and Brazil.

So when we went looking for the tournament's clearest fingerprint in America's foot-traffic data, we assumed the single spot (outside of a stadium) where we could see the on-the-ground impact of the World Cup would be a downtown fan zone or a stadium-adjacent street packed with bars.
But, no. It was a Waffle House, in Atlanta, a few miles away from the Mercedes-Benz stadium.
The internet saw it too
The data isn't the only place this showed up. Waffle House had a genuine viral moment during the tournament. A German fan posting as @FreddyLA7 documented his 1am first-ever Waffle House run ("great food, great prices, friendly staff, 10/10") and the post racked up millions of views, with Waffle House's own account chiming in to thank him. He wasn't alone: international fans across social media went wide-eyed over American institutions like Buc-ee's, Walmart, and, again and again, Waffle House.
Waffle House leaned all the way in. The downtown Atlanta location, a short walk from the FIFA Fan Festival, opened a pop-up shop selling Waffle House soccer jerseys and branded soccer balls, and fans from around the world lined up for a piece of it.
So when our data shows Waffle House traffic concentrating near the Atlanta stadium once matches began, it isn't measuring something invisible. It's the quantified version of a thing the internet was already buzzing about. The memes said "the fans found the Waffle House." The foot-traffic data says: yes, they did, here's exactly how much.
The one signal that popped
We pulled the foot-traffic data for all eleven host cities to find out.
In Atlanta, around Mercedes-Benz Stadium, here's what surfaced. In the weeks before the tournament, about 8.5% of metro Atlanta's Waffle House visits happened within three miles of the stadium. Once the World Cup started, that jumped to 16.6%. The share of the city's Waffle House traffic clustering around the venue roughly doubled.

Now the part that makes it interesting
This wasn't just a correlation to a surge in visitors to Atlanta. We checked. Overall foot traffic near the stadium barely budged, the metro didn't surge, and the area around the venue didn't broadly fill up. And it wasn't chain restaurants in general: Chili's, three miles from the same stadium, showed no change.
It was Waffle House, specifically. And, once the matches started, specifically.
Which, if you think about it, tracks perfectly. A 24-hour, cash-friendly, no-pretense diner steps from a World Cup stadium is exactly where you end up after a match, whether you're a Buckhead local or you drove three hours for the game. The World Cup didn't flood Atlanta; it funneled a very particular crowd into a very particular institution.
Why a city-level headline would have missed this entirely
Ask "did the World Cup boost Atlanta?" and the honest answer is a shrug. City-wide, not measurably.
Ask "what happened inside a three-mile ring around the stadium, at one specific kind of place, once the whistle blew?" And there's your story.
Mega-events don't necessarily move cities in one big uniform wave. They move specific people to specific places at specific times, and most of that is invisible unless you can zoom all the way in. Foot-traffic data allows us to zoom in and understand movement patterns before, during, and after an event. In this case, it was Waffle House.
Methodology
We looked at foot traffic during the 2026 FIFA World Cup tournament's opening weeks (June 11–30) versus the weeks right before it, measuring visits within three miles of each host stadium as a share of total metro visits to the same chains (Chili's and Waffle House). Using each city as its own before-and-after control keeps the comparison honest and unaffected by shifts in data coverage over time. We ran it across all eleven US host cities and both chains. Atlanta Waffle House was the signal that stood up.
The rest of the host cities? Quiet. Which, honestly, is its own finding: the World Cup's footprint on American foot traffic was less a wave and more a very precise splash.
A note on the numbers: the international-visitor figure and the Waffle House figure come from two different datasets and describe two separate facts. Our data shows the world was here, and separately shows where Atlanta's Waffle House traffic went, it doesn't claim the visitors themselves were the ones ordering hash browns.
This is the kind of question movement data is built to answer: not "did something happen," but exactly where, exactly when, and exactly who showed up. Get in touch to explore what mobility data can reveal for you.

The 5 Biggest Mistakes Buyers Make When Evaluating Mobility Data, and How to Avoid Them
Choosing a mobility data provider isn't just about comparing datasets.
Whether you're building audiences, measuring campaign performance, selecting new retail locations, or powering research and AI models, the quality of your decisions depends on choosing the right data, and the right partner.
Yet many evaluation processes focus on the wrong criteria. Buyers compare scale, coverage, or pricing before they've clearly defined their use case or goals.
After years of working with agencies, retailers, researchers, and technology partners, we've seen the same evaluation mistakes surface time and again.
Here are five of the most common mistakes (and how to avoid them).
Mistake #1: Starting with the Data Instead of the Business Problem
One of the biggest mistakes buyers make is evaluating providers before they've clearly defined what they're trying to accomplish.
Different use cases require different strengths.
For example:
- Audience creation may prioritize scale and consistency.
- Retail site selection may depend on geographic precision and long-term visitation trends.
- Attribution requires reliable methodology and confidence in movement patterns.
- AI applications often demand flexible access to large, well-structured datasets.
Without first defining your objectives, it's easy to optimize for the wrong criteria — choosing a provider based on the largest dataset, the lowest price, or the longest feature list, rather than the one that's best suited to your specific use case.
Before evaluating vendors, ask yourself:
- What business question am I trying to answer or solve?
- Who will use this data, and how?
- What does success look like?
- Which capabilities are essential and which are nice to have?
Once that answer is clear, evaluating providers becomes much more straightforward. Instead of searching for the "best" mobility data provider, you'll be looking for the provider that's best equipped to help you achieve your goals.
Mistake #2: Assuming All Mobility Data Is Created Equal
Not all mobility data is collected, processed, or delivered in the same way, and those differences can have a meaningful impact on the insights you generate.
Providers may offer:
- Raw location observations
- Processed or modeled datasets
- Aggregated insights
- Specialized products built for specific workflows
None of these approaches is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on what you're trying to accomplish, who will be using the data, and how much flexibility or customization your team requires.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- How is the data collected and sourced?
- What processing or modeling has been applied?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- What quality assurance and validation processes are in place?
- Does the provider offer the data in a format that fits my workflow—whether that's raw data, APIs, or ready-to-use insights?
Understanding these differences will help ensure you're evaluating providers based on what matters most for your business, rather than assuming all mobility data delivers the same value.
Mistake #3: Confusing More Data with Better Data
Bigger is not always better. A larger dataset isn't valuable if it lacks the precision, consistency, or quality required for your application.
If you're building national audiences, training AI models, or conducting broad market analysis, having a large, representative dataset can be a significant advantage. In these scenarios, greater scale often translates into more robust insights and better statistical confidence.
But there are many cases where simply having more data won't improve your results.
For applications like visitation analysis, site selection, attribution, or localized market intelligence, factors such as precision, consistency, and data quality can be just as important — if not more so — than the total number of devices.
Instead of asking, "Who has the biggest dataset?" consider questions like:
- Is the dataset representative of the population I'm trying to understand?
- Is coverage consistent across the geographies that matter most to me?
- How is data quality monitored and maintained?
- How frequently is the data refreshed?
- Does the provider have the scale my specific use case requires?
The best mobility data provider for you is the one with the right combination of scale, quality, and consistency for your business objectives.
Mistake #4: Treating Privacy as a Checkbox
Privacy has become one of the most important considerations when evaluating mobility data, but it's about much more than checking a compliance box.
As regulations continue to evolve and consumer expectations around data transparency increase, organizations need confidence that the data they're using has been collected and managed responsibly. A provider's approach to privacy doesn't just impact legal compliance—it can also influence data quality, business continuity, and long-term trust.
When evaluating mobility data providers, ask questions such as:
- How is user consent obtained and respected?
- How is data collected and sourced?
- What governance and quality controls are in place?
- How does the provider adapt to changing privacy regulations?
- What processes exist to ensure responsible data stewardship over time?
The strongest providers view privacy as an ongoing commitment. They invest in transparent practices, continuously monitor the evolving regulatory landscape, and build privacy considerations into the way they collect, manage, and deliver data.
Ultimately, a thoughtful approach to privacy benefits everyone. It helps organizations reduce risk, maintain confidence in their data strategy, and build solutions that are sustainable as the industry continues to evolve.
Mistake #5: Assuming There's Only One Way to Access Mobility Data
One of the most overlooked aspects of evaluating a mobility data provider is how you'll actually access and use the data.
Organizations have different technical capabilities, workflows, and business needs. A data science team building custom models has very different requirements than a marketing team looking for audience insights or an analyst exploring visitation trends.
That's why the best providers offer multiple ways to work with their data.
For example, at Veraset, customers can choose the approach that best fits their organization:
- Flat Files for organizations that want direct access to raw data for custom analysis, modeling, and integration into their own environments.
- APIs for teams that need real-time or on-demand access to mobility data within existing applications and workflows.
- Self-Service Platform for business users who want to explore mobility insights, visualize trends, and answer questions without relying on engineering resources.
No single delivery method is inherently better than another. The right choice depends on your team's technical expertise, your existing technology stack, and the business problems you're trying to solve.
As you evaluate providers, consider questions like:
- Does this provider support the way my team prefers to work?
- Can different teams access the data in the ways they need?
- Will this delivery model scale as our use cases evolve?
- If our needs change, will we have to switch providers or simply use a different product?
The best mobility data partner isn't just one that delivers high-quality data. It's one that can deliver that data in the format that creates the most value for your organization today and as your business grows.
What Great Evaluations Have in Common
Successful buyers don't begin by comparing vendors; they begin by defining success. They ask thoughtful questions about their business objectives, data quality requirements, privacy expectations, and operational workflows before narrowing their list of providers.
That approach consistently leads to stronger partnerships and better business outcomes.
If you're evaluating mobility data providers, we'd be happy to help you think through the process. Whether you're comparing vendors, validating an existing solution, or exploring a new use case, our team can help you ask the right questions before making a decision.
Get in touch to discuss your use case.

What Our Partners Say
Hear from organizations building with Veraset data.
“Partnering with Veraset has elevated our ability to deliver highly effective, data-driven campaigns. They’re not just a data provider, they’re a strategic partner that has helped us deliver better outcomes for our clients.”
Put Our Data to the Test
Request a demo or start an evaluation today.



.jpg)
.jpg)


